Which Flare liquid-staking protocol earns more?

On-chain exchange-rate growth. Verifiable by anyone.

Showing sample data — live data source not reachable.

sFLR staking — key metrics

Yield performance

Rolling APY

On-chain exchange-rate growth, annualized with compounding. Faded dashed = productive APY; shaded = TVL (right axis).

Validator selection

Validators sFLR delegates to — public on-chain set, monitored for uptime and yield.

How this is measured

Realized APY — the protocol's exchange rate growth over the rolling window, annualized with compounding. It reflects everything that happened to the pool: inflows dilute the rate, outflows concentrate it. Short windows are noisy; longer windows show the durable rate.

APY = (r₂ / r₁) ^ (365 / days) − 1

Productive APY — yield per unit of deployed capital, counting only stake that has had time to be delegated to validators. New deposits take ~2 epochs (~7 days) to start earning; stripping out that idle capital lets two pools be compared fairly regardless of how fast each is growing.

productive TVL = TVL from 2 epochs ago
APY = (1 + rewards / productive TVL) ^ (365 / days) − 1

Both figures derive from public on-chain data and can be reproduced independently from each protocol's staking contract.